Center for American Progress Action

Donate

Center for American Progress Action

5 Ways Donald Trump’s Plans Are Even More Extreme Than Project 2025
Report

5 Ways Donald Trump’s Plans Are Even More Extreme Than Project 2025

Donald Trump and JD Vance are trying to hide their connections to Project 2025 but are not running away from the playbook’s far-right policies. In fact, some of their proposals and statements are even more extreme than those advanced in Project 2025.

Restoring Social Trust in Democracy, Democracy, Economy, +5 More

In this article
Photo shows Donald Trump standing in front of a mic wearing a red tie
Former President Donald Trump speaks in Atlanta, October 2024. (Getty/Kevin Dietsch)

Project 2025 is a plan to gut America’s system of checks and balances in order to enact an extreme, far-right agenda that would hurt all Americans.1

Donald Trump, running mate JD Vance, and MAGA Republicans have tried to distance themselves from the extremely unpopular proposal, but their ties to Project 2025 and its authors at the Heritage Foundation are clear:

  • Donald Trump rode a private jet with Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts in 2022 to a conference where Trump said in a speech that the think tank was going to “lay the groundwork and detail plans for exactly what our movement will do.”2
  • Sen. Vance (R-OH) wrote the forward to Roberts’ forthcoming book and called the Heritage Foundation the most “influential engine of ideas for Republicans.”3
  • Roberts said that he had personally talked to Trump about Project 2025.4
  • Russ Vought, one of Project 2025’s coauthors, has said that Trump’s disavowals of Project 2025 were “politics” and that the former president had “blessed” and was “very supportive” of Vought and his organization’s work.5
  • The Heritage Foundation brought in 100 right-wing groups involving at least 140 top Trump administration allies to help build consensus for Project 2025.6

Trump and Vance are trying to hide their connections to Project 2025, but they are not running away from the proposals in the right-wing playbook. In fact, their policy proposals and statements on the campaign trail are frequently even more radical than those housed in Project 2025.

Here are five examples of how their plans and comments are even more extreme than Project 2025.

Eroding democracy

Project 2025

Project 2025 lays out a plan to consolidate power in the presidency by destroying the U.S. system of checks and balances and weakening the independence of public agencies. For example, Project 2025 proposes replacing tens of thousands of nonpartisan civil servants with far-right lackeys who are loyal to MAGA ideology.7

Moreover, Project 2025 would end the independence of law enforcement agencies, such as the FBI and the U.S. Department of Justice. Under Project 2025, the president would have the power to use all the resources of the federal government to investigate and to prosecute whomever the president wants.8 In light of the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision in Trump v. United States—which declared that presidents are immune from criminal prosecution for official acts—the risk of a commander-in-chief using their unchecked power to act illegally is a huge danger to democracy.9 This is a page directly out of the playbook of authoritarian regimes, where dictators will exploit or create loopholes to act above the law, and it has been a hallmark of democracies sliding into authoritarianism.10

Trump

Trump’s policy plan, called Agenda 47, and his comments on the campaign trail in many instances go further than what is outlined in Project 2025.11 Trump would:

  • Use the government to go after anyone who disagrees with him or MAGA Republicans. While Project 2025 calls for a weakening of the independence of government agencies such as the Department of Justice and for the president to be able to fire civil servants and replace them with political lackeys, Trump has taken it further with his proposals and comments. Trump’s plans would give him the authority to prosecute any of his enemies.12 In recent weeks, Trump has pledged to jail election workers, donors, and others who don’t do his bidding if he wins the 2024 election and has also said that critics of the Supreme Court’s decision overturning Roe v. Wade should be thrown in jail.13Trump’s short list for attorney general reportedly includes Judge Aileen Cannon, who threw out Trump’s classified documents case in Florida over the Department of Justice’s appointment of special counsel Jack Smith, despite the fact that similar arguments have been dismissed many times before, and Jeffrey Clark, an election denier and an attorney who worked in the environmental division of the Department of Justice who Trump considered appointing acting attorney general during his final alleged attempts to overturn the 2020 election results in key swing states such as Georgia.14A disciplinary panel has recommended Clark face a two-year suspension from practicing law over his actions to try to overturn the 2020 election.15 These are the types of political loyalists who likely won’t hesitate to do Trump’s bidding if he is reelected. The Atlantic recently reported Trump said he wanted generals like the ones Hitler had, and Trump has also said he plans to deploy the U.S. military against “the enemy within”—including his perceived domestic political opponents, such as Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) as well as Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and her husband, who was attacked in 2022 by an assailant who was drawn to right-wing conspiracies. This highly illegal move would destabilize democracy and its longstanding political norms.16 Under a future Trump administration, millions of ordinary Americans could be at risk of surveillance, arrest, or imprisonment if they dare speak out against Trump on any issue.

International case studies: Russia and Venezuela

Using the government to assail political opponents is a trademark of authoritarian regimes. Russian President Vladimir Putin is notorious for doing this: He jailed opposition leader Alexei Navalny on dubious fraud and parole violation charges. Navalny died in a Russian prison earlier this year.17 In Venezuela, President Nicolas Maduro’s government charged opposition leader Edmundo Gonzalez earlier this year over questionable conspiracy allegations and other supposed crimes.18 Egyptian authorities under President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi of Egypt jailed his political opponent and the opponent’s family members in the last presidential race in 2023.19 And Turkish courts in 2022 sentenced President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s political rival Ekrem Imamoglu to jail for speech deemed “insulting.”20

  • Suppress the vote and change election rules. Trump’s policy plans would push Republicans to enact laws that make it harder for people, especially in long-marginalized communities, to cast their ballots.21 These efforts are based on the “Big Lie” that Trump won the 2020 election—a lie that Vance recently affirmed he believes—and that reforms are needed to ensure the election isn’t “stolen”’ again in 2024.22 Trump’s plans would nationalize this effort, which has already been ongoing in many states since 2020.23

    MAGA Republicans are also following Trump’s marching orders and have changed election rules in many states to make it easier for them to sabotage election results and thwart the will of the people.24 In Georgia, MAGA Republicans on the state’s election board enacted changes that would make it harder to determine who won the 2024 election in the state and easier for partisan officials to subvert election results that they disagree with.25 MAGA Republicans are appealing a recent ruling from a judge in Georgia who said the changes are illegal and unconstitutional.26Nebraska almost made a last-minute change to how its Electoral College votes are tallied to make it easier for Trump to win the 2024 election. Americans can expect more of these efforts if Trump wins a second term.27

International case studies: Venezuela and Hungary

Suppressing the vote and manipulating elections are authoritarian policies that help those looking to amass power. In Venezuela, Maduro and his allies manipulated the election systems to stay in power during the country’s presidential election in 2018, its parliamentary elections in 2020, and the most recent presidential election this year. The United States considers all three elections fraudulent.28 Efforts to make it harder to vote are also a trademark of Hungary Prime Minister Viktor Orbán. He won in 2010 and has overseen electoral redistricting that has allowed him to stay in power ever since.29

  • Scapegoat vulnerable communities to foment division. Trump regularly scapegoats vulnerable communities, particularly immigrants, to rile up his base and divide people in ways that go well beyond what is proposed in Project 2025. Trump has repeated racist conspiracy theories and lies that immigrants are eating pets in Springfield, Ohio; that Venezuelan street gangs have taken over Aurora, Colorado; that the Biden administration is sending Haitian immigrants to Charleroi, Pennsylvania, to displace the people living there; and that the U.S. Department of Homeland Security is diverting disaster relief funds from recovery efforts in the aftermath of Hurricanes Helene and Milton to take care of immigrants.30His Agenda 47 plan uses similarly false and dangerous rhetoric that the Biden administration is encouraging immigrants to “invade” the country.31 The results have been devastating for these communities. In Springfield, for example, bomb threats have closed schools; the Republican mayor received death threats; and residents were afraid to even go outside.32

    Trump has long used dehumanizing rhetoric to scapegoat everyone from immigrants to his political opponents. Trump has said immigrants are “poisoning the blood” of this country; has pledged to build detention camps on the Southern border to house the millions of immigrants he plans to round up and mass deport; and has suggested this process will be “bloody.”33 Trump has also called his political opponents “vermin” and “the enemy within” and has insinuated they are sub-human.34

International case studies: Germany, Poland, Hungary, and Tunisia

Scapegoating and dehumanizing vulnerable communities has often led to dangerous and catastrophic outcomes. For instance, Adolf Hitler, who said Germany was suffering from “blood poisoning,” went on to use the antisemitism he made official Nazi government policy as a justification for the state-sanctioned murder of at least 6 million Jews and millions ofother religious and racial minorities during the Holocaust.35 In more recent years, authoritarians in Poland and Hungary have repeatedly demonized immigrants to solidify their power and dangerously stoke their supporters.36 And in Tunisia, President Kais Saied has employed the racist “Great Replacement Theory,” which has underpinnings in neofascist movements and anti-immigrant sentiment in the United States and Europe, to mass expel Black immigrants, foment attacks on Black Tunisians, and consolidate power.37

These policy positions could shatter some of democracy’s most important guardrails and put the freedoms and rights of Americans at extreme risk.

Bypassing Congress to consolidate power

Project 2025

Project 2025 would destroy the system of checks and balances upon which the United States was founded.38 Core to its radical vision is an extreme interpretation of a conservative legal concept called the “unitary executive theory.”39

In the 1930s, Congress created independent specialized agencies that were housed under the executive branch and staffed with experts, career scientists, and other nonpartisan employees who work in the public interest and are in charge of keeping Americans’ water clean, transportation safe, and medicines effective.40 Congress gave these agencies some of its authority on the condition that Congress was not ceding power to the president.41 Unitary executive theory sees the independence of these agencies from the White House as illegitimate.42 Project 2025 would bring these agencies under the direct control of the president, granting the president unprecedented authority.43 Under this theory, a president could tear down the firewalls between the White House and the agencies; fire agency commissioners and career civil servants and replace them with political lackeys; and exert more sway over agencies’ actions by having them submitted to the White House for review instead of the current practice of submitting them to the courts.44

Case study: Politicizing the Federal Reserve

The Federal Reserve is an independent agency that serves as the central bank of the United States and supervises the financial system, drives our monetary policy, and responds to financial conditions.45 It is ultimately accountable to the public and Congress—not to the political whims of a president.46 Project 2025 could change that. Said Vought, one of the architects of Project 2025 who adheres to unitary executive theory: “It’s very hard to square the Fed’s independence with the Constitution.”47 Trump has said before that the president should have a say in interest rates set by the Federal Reserve.48 Project 2025 would make it easier for a future president to try and change interest rates for their political benefit, which would have profound ramifications for the United States and global economies.49 In the 1970s, President Richard Nixon successfully berated his Federal Reserve chairman—a Republican loyal to Nixon—into lowering interest rates before an election. The move ultimately sent the United States into nearly a decade of high prices and a stagnant economy until Paul Volcker became Federal Reserve chairman and raised interest rates 20 percent to tame inflation.50 The United States could find itself in a similar scenario if the firewalls between the White House and the Federal Reserve are torn down.

Project 2025’s reforms could also make it easier for a future president to exert more power and control over other independent agencies such as the Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal Communications Commission—which oversees the press in the United States—and more.51

Trump

Trump goes a step further than what is outlined in Project 2025. In addition to implementing this extreme version of the unitary executive theory, Trump has also said that he won’t spend money as the laws passed by Congress require, even though the Constitution gives Congress the power of the purse.52 Project 2025 is ambiguous on this process—called impoundment—but it is clear that Trump views this process as another way to consolidate power and dismantle our system of checks and balances.53

Impoundment would let the president unilaterally change most spending laws and ignore spending they do not support. That means that Trump could try to gut the entire U.S. Department of Education, the U.S. Department of the Interior, and the “environmental agencies” through the impoundment process, as he’s suggested he would do in recent months.54He might also withhold funds from states and localities with which he has policy disagreements or which voted against his election to be president. These plans are a violation of the Impoundment Act and could break the law, as the Government Accountability Office said after Trump had withheld congressionally appropriated funds to Ukraine in 2019 to pressure the country into launching a bogus investigation into Joe Biden.55 These actions resulted in Trump’s first impeachment.56

Yet Donald Trump continues to broadcast his plans to challenge Congress’ authority if he’s reelected.57 This is a threat that needs to be taken even more seriously after the Supreme Court made the president a “king above the law,” as Justice Sonia Sotomayor said in her dissent in Trump v. United States.58 If elected, Trump could argue he was acting in an official capacity to ignore congressionally appropriated funding in the future and throw the country into unchartered territory.59

Education

Project 2025

Project 2025 calls for drastic reforms that would significantly harm education in America and set the country back. Specifically, the plan proposes:

  • Abolishing the Department of Education
  • Getting rid of Head Start, a no-cost child care program currently serving roughly 833,000 people living in poverty
  • Ending Title I programs that provide federal funding to schools serving low-income children. These reforms would eliminate 180,000 teaching positions that serve 2.8 million students
  • Eliminating the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program, which provides debt relief to individuals serving their communities, such as teachers, first responders, and other public servants60

Project 2025 would also censor academic learning, make book banning in schools a federal priority, and criminalize librarians who allow students to choose banned books. It would also restrict LGBTQI+ policies that benefit all students, leading to increased rates of bullying and lower educational outcomes.61

Trump

Once again, Trump has taken his plan a step further in recent months, saying that, if reelected, he would cut federal funding for public schools that have vaccination requirements.62 Not only are all public schools subjected to state-mandated vaccination requirements for communicable diseases, but the public overwhelmingly supports them.63 Trump’s plan would leave local public school districts with an impossible choice: lose all federal funding—which, in some, cases may make up nearly 20 percent of their education budget, according to recent estimates from the 2021 school year—or eliminate vaccine requirements and risk wave after wave of preventable illnesses that would harm or even kill their students and potentially bring previously eliminated diseases such as measles or polio back into American communities.64

  • According to a 2022 survey from Texas A&M University, public support for vaccination requirements for K-12 students was as high as 90 percent for diseases such as diphtheria, rubella, measles, and polio. Support for COVID-19 vaccination requirements was near 70 percent, and support for hepatitis and HPV vaccination requirements were 84 percent and 75 percent, respectively.65
  • According to KFF, as of 2023, all states and the District of Columbia require children to be vaccinated against certain diseases in order to attend public schools, though exemptions are allowed in certain circumstances. The overwhelming majority of students adhere to the requirements: For example, 93 percent of kindergartners in the United States received all state-mandated vaccines during the 2022–2023 school year.66

Vaccination is considered one of the most cost-effective interventions to prevent infectious disease, disability, and death—and in some cases eliminate diseases altogether.67School vaccination requirements are an effective way to keep children and the public safe.68 Because of scientific advancements and childhood vaccination programs, 508 million cases of illness, 32 million hospitalizations, and more than 1 million deaths have been prevented over the past 30 years. These steps have resulted in $540 billion in direct savings and larger societal savings of $2.7 trillion.69

However, Trump and his allies such as Robert F. Kennedy Jr. would take Americans back to a world where children are sicker and at risk of dying from preventable illness, all while undermining their education.70 Kennedy has said that if Trump is reelected, he’s promised him control of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.71 This is someone who has spewed conspiracy theories and lies about vaccines for years.72

Taxes

Project 2025

Project 2025 proposes radical tax policies such as lowering the corporate tax rate 18 percent, which would amount to a $24 billion tax cut for the Fortune 100.73 The plan would raise taxes by $3,000 for a typical family of four and by $950 for a typical single-person household. It also seeks, in the longer term, to replace the individual and corporate taxes with a flat consumption tax such as a national sales tax. Changing the tax code in this way would increase taxes for the middle 20 percent of households by $5,900 on average and would cut taxes on the top 0.1 percent by $2 million on average.74

Trump

Trump has said that he wants to lower the corporate tax rate to 15 percent, which amounts to about a $50 billion tax cut for the Fortune 100.75 Despite pledging to fight for the middle class, Trump’s tax plan would reward big corporations and the wealthiest Americans while inflation and costs would go up for average American families.76Trump’s entire tax plan can be seen as the first step of Project 2025’s ultimate goal of replacing income taxes with consumption taxes.77 He would cut income and corporate taxes and impose enormous taxes on imported goods that would function like a flat consumption tax.78 If Trump instituted a 20 percent tax on imported goods, as he has suggested he might, it would amount to a nearly $4,000 tax increase for a typical family.79

Workers and the labor movement

Project 2025

Project 2025 would undermine the right to form and join unions; weaken collective bargaining power; and would make it harder for workers to fight for better wages, benefits, and working conditions.80

Trump

Despite his disingenuous efforts to gain the backing of the labor movement—from seeking out a Teamsters endorsement to falsely suggesting his policies would help the working class—Trump’s disdain for the labor movement goes beyond what is outlined in Project 2025.81 In a recent interview with Elon Musk, Trump praised Musk for his anti-union stances and advocated for firing striking employees.82 Firing striking employees or threatening to do so is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRB), the federal agency that protects workers who seek better wages.83

While in office, Trump passed a tax giveaway that rewarded large corporations and the wealthy, appointed union busters to the NLRB, appointed judges with hostile views toward the labor movement, and rolled back worker protections.84 He also repeatedly voiced support for “right to work” laws, which would take away rights from working people, and pushed Congress to pass this type of legislation at the federal level.85

Conclusion

Project 2025 is a far-right authoritarian playbook that would rip away fundamental rights and enact a plan that would harm all Americans. Donald Trump, JD Vance, and MAGA Republicans have doubled down on the policies in the playbook. And, in several instances, they have gone even further than what Project 2025 calls for.

When it comes to democracy, education, taxes, workers’ rights, and America’s system of checks and balances, Trump’s vision for the future frequently goes beyond what is spelled out in Project 2025. These policy plans put the freedoms and rights that the American people hold dear at extreme risk.

Endnotes

  1. Colin Seeberger, “Project 2025’s Plan To Gut Checks and Balances Harms the American People,” Center for American Progress, August 8, 2024, available at https://www.americanprogress.org/article/project-2025s-plan-to-gut-checks-and-balances-harms-the-american-people/.
  2. Isaac Arnsdorf, Josh Dawsey and Hannah Knowles, “Trump took a private flight with Project 2025 leader in 2022,” The Washington Post, August 7, 2024, available at https://www.washingtonpost.com/elections/2024/08/07/trump-heritage-project-2025-roberts/.
  3. Ibid.
  4. Ibid.
  5. Curt Devine, Casey Tolan, Audrey Ash and Kyung Lah, “Hidden-camera video shows Project 2025 co-author discussing his secret work preparing for a second Trump term,” CNN, August 15, 2024, available at https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/15/politics/russ-vought-project-2025-trump-secret-recording-invs/index.html.
  6. Arnsdorf, Dawsey and Knowles, “Trump took a private flight with Project 2025 leader in 2022”
  7. Will Ragland and Joe Radosevich, “Project 2025: The Plan To Seize Power by Gutting America’s System of Checks and Balances,” Center for American Progress, July 8, 2024, available at https://www.americanprogress.org/article/project-2025-the-plan-to-seize-power-by-gutting-americas-system-of-checks-and-balances/.
  8. Ibid.
  9. Jeevna Sheth, “Trump v. United States: A Foundation for Authoritarian Actions an American President Can Now Commit with Impunity,” Center for American Progress, August 7, 2024, available at https://www.americanprogress.org/article/trump-v-united-states-a-foundation-for-authoritarian-actions-an-american-president-can-now-commit-with-impunity/.
  10. Sharan Grewal, “ Kais Saied’s power grab in Tunisia,” Brookings, July 26, 2021, available at https://www.brookings.edu/articles/kais-saieds-power-grab-in-tunisia/; Steven A. Cook, “Why Dictators Always Pretend to Love the Law,” Foreign Policy, November 10, 2021, available at https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/11/10/why-dictators-always-pretend-to-love-the-law/.
  11. Agenda 47, “2024 GOP Platform Make America Great Again!,” available at https://rncplatform.donaldjtrump.com/?_gl=1*1lym07u*_gcl_au*MTYwMDg1NDYxNy4xNzI4NDk2OTA5&_ga=2.144794548.162111648.1728496909-448732447.1728496909 (last accessed October 2024)
  12. Ibid.
  13. Amy Gardner, Colby Itkowitz and Mariana Alfaro, “Trump pledges to jail opponents, baselessly suggests election will be stolen from him” The Washington Post, September 8, 2024, available at https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/09/08/trump-election-threats/; Kamala HQ, @KamalaHQ, September 23, 2024, 9:07p.m. ET, X, available at https://x.com/KamalaHQ/status/1838384672595657175.
  14. Katherine Faulders, Will Steakin, John Santucci, and Alexander Mallin, “Judge who tossed Trump’s classified docs case on list of proposed candidates for attorney general,” ABC News, October 22, 2024, available at: https://abcnews.go.com/US/judge-tossed-trumps-classified-docs-case-list-proposed/story?id=114997807; Eric Tucker, “Federal judge dismisses Trump classified documents case over concerns with prosecutor’s appointment,” The Associated Press, July 15, 2024, available at: https://apnews.com/article/trump-classified-documents-smith-c66d5ffb7ba86c1b991f95e89bdeba0c
  15. Kyle Cheney, “Key Trump ally in 2020 should lose law license for two years, DC disciplinary panel rules,” Politico, August 1, 2024, available at: https://www.politico.com/news/2024/08/01/jeffrey-clark-law-license-suspension-00172320
  16. Jeffrey Goldberg, “Trump: ‘I Need the Kind of Generals That Hitler Had,’” The Atlantic, October 22, 2024, available at: https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2024/10/trump-military-generals-hitler/680327/;  Maegan Vazquez, “Trump urges using military to handle ‘radical left lunatics’ on Election Day,” The Washington Post, October 13, 2024, available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/10/13/trump-military-enemies-within/; Erin Doherty, “Trump name checks “Pelosis” as he doubles down on “enemy from within” rhetoric,” Axios, October 16, 2024, available at https://www.axios.com/2024/10/16/trump-fox-town-hall-democrats-2024; Olga R. Rodriguez, “Man accused of attacking Paul Pelosi with a hammer testifies he was drawn to right-wing conspiracies by ‘Gamergate,” The Associated Press, November 14, 2023, available at https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/the-man-accused-of-attacking-paul-pelosi-with-a-hammer-says-he-wanted-to-end-corruption.
  17. Lucy Papachristou, “What we know about Alexei Navalny’s death in Arctic prison,” Reuters, February 19 2024, available at https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/alexei-navalnys-death-what-do-we-know-2024-02-18/; Camille Gijs, “Alexei Navalny given 9-year jail term after being found guilty on fraud charges,” Politico,March 22, 2022, available at https://www.politico.eu/article/russia-court-alexei-navalny-guilty-fraud-charges/.
  18. Vivian Sequera and Mayela Armas, “Venezuela issues arrest warrant for opposition leader Gonzalez, AG says,” Reuters, September 4, 2024, available at https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/venezuela-attorney-general-requests-arrest-warrant-opposition-leader-gonzalez-2024-09-02/.
  19. Human Rights Watch, “Egypt: Mass Arrests Target Family, Supporters of Ex-MP,” September 5, 2023, available at https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/05/05/egypt-mass-arrests-target-family-supporters-ex-mp.
  20. Ali Kucukgocmen, “Turkish court sentences Erdogan rival to jail with political ban,” Reuters, December 14, 2022, available at https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/turkish-court-sentences-erdogan-rival-jail-insulting-officials-2022-12-14/.
  21. Agenda47, page 15, #6 “Republicans Will Ensure Election Integrity,” available at https://rncplatform.donaldjtrump.com/?_gl=1*sjghq7*_gcl_au*MzkxMjA4ODU0LjE3MjYwODkxNjc.&_ga=2.210188949.1296331238.1726089167-2101883872.1726089167 (last accessed October 2024).
  22. Anne Tindall, “What is the Big Lie?,” Protect Democracy, August 15, 2023, available at https://protectdemocracy.org/work/what-is-the-big-lie/; Michael C. Bender, “The R.N.C. Has a New Interview Question: Was the 2020 Election Stolen?,” The New York Times, March 27, 2024, available at https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/27/us/politics/rnc-trump-2020-election.html.
  23. Elise Viebeck, “Here’s where GOP lawmakers have passed new voting restrictions around the country,” The Washington Post, July 14, 2021, available at https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/06/02/state-voting-restrictions/.
  24. Ibid.
  25. Hady Mawajdeh and Noel King, “Can Georgia’s MAGA election board actually rig the vote for Trump?,” Vox, September 24, 2024, available at https://www.vox.com/today-explained-podcast/373334/georgia-election-board-rule-changes-trump.
  26. Kate Brumback And Jeff Amy, “Republicans appeal a Georgia judge’s ruling that invalidates seven election rules,” The Associated Press, (October 17, 2024), available at https://apnews.com/article/georgia-election-rules-invalidated-appeal-f5a6fd0ca2dffb13eed3d2a89494b25f.
  27. NPR’s Washington Desk, “A GOP push to change how Nebraska awards its electoral votes appears to have stalled,” September 23, 2024, available at https://www.npr.org/2024/09/23/nx-s1-5123961/nebraska-electoral-college.
  28. U.S. MIssion to the Organization of American States, “OAS Resolution Condemns the Fraudulent Elections in Venezuela,” December 9, 2020, available at https://usoas.usmission.gov/oas-resolution-condemns-the-fraudulent-elections-in-venezuela/; Alfredo Meza, Stefano Pozzebon and Abel Alvarado, “US says Maduro lost Venezuela election as opposition leader says she’s in hiding,” CNN, August 2, 2024, available at https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/01/americas/venezuela-election-opposition-machado-hiding-intl-latam/index.html.
  29. Robert Benson, “Hungary’s Democratic Backsliding Threatens the Trans-Atlantic Security Order,” Center for American Progress, January 22, 2024, available at https://www.americanprogress.org/article/hungarys-democratic-backsliding-threatens-the-trans-atlantic-security-order/.
  30. Mike Catalini, Julie Carr Smyth, and Bruce Shipkowski, “Trump falsely accuses immigrants in Ohio of abducting and eating pets,” The Associated Press, September 11, 2024, available at https://apnews.com/article/haitian-immigrants-vance-trump-ohio-6e4a47c52b23ae2c802d216369512ca5; Jonathan Weisman, “How the False Story of a Gang ‘Takeover’ in Colorado Reached Trump,” The New York Times, September 15, 2024, available at https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/15/us/politics/trump-aurora-colorado-immigration.html; Nicholas Bogel-Burroughs, “‘Quiet Place’ in Pennsylvania Is Thrust Into Loud Immigration Debate,” The New York Times, September 27, 2024, available at https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/27/us/charleroi-pennsylvania-haitian-migrants.html; Stephen Fowler, “Fact-checking falsehoods about FEMA funding and Hurricane Helene,” NPR, October 7, 2024, available at https://www.npr.org/2024/10/07/nx-s1-5144159/fema-funding-migrants-disaster-relief-fund; Melissa Goldin, “FACT FOCUS: A look at the false information around Hurricanes Helene and Milton,” The Associated Press, October 11, 2024, available at https://apnews.com/article/election-hurricanes-false-info-helene-milton-a4c2df2463b69c1f2e3eb6846e3b37ae.
  31. Agenda47, page 3, Preamble, available at https://rncplatform.donaldjtrump.com/?_gl=1*sjghq7*_gcl_au*MzkxMjA4ODU0LjE3MjYwODkxNjc.&_ga=2.210188949.1296331238.1726089167-2101883872.1726089167 (last accessed October 2024).
  32. The Associated Press: “Bomb threats close schools and offices after Trump spread false rumors about Haitians in Ohio,” September 13, 2024, available at https://apnews.com/article/bomb-threats-springfield-ohio-debunked-claims-haitians-1df37561204dd7733db4a6459e87e24c; John P. Wise, “Springfield mayor says he’s now getting death threats,” WSYX, September 17, 2024, available at https://wlos.com/news/nation-world/springfield-ohio-mayor-rob-rue-haitian-immigrants-eating-pets-cats-dogs-stealing-geese-death-threats-downtown-columbus-statehouse-donald-trump-jd-vance; Doc Louallen, “Ohio Haitian immigrants say they are afraid to leave home after recent backlash,” ABC News, September 18, 2024, available at https://abcnews.go.com/US/ohio-haitian-immigrants-afraid-leave-home-after-recent/story?id=113727280.
  33. Marianne LeVine and Meryl Kornfield, “Trump’s anti-immigrant onslaught sparks fresh alarm heading into 2024,” The Washington Post, October 12, 2023, available at https://www.washingtonpost.com/elections/2023/10/12/trump-immigrants-comments-criticism/; Charlie Savage, Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan, “Sweeping Raids, Giant Camps and Mass Deportations: Inside Trump’s 2025 Immigration Plans,” The New York Times, November 11, 2023, available at https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/11/us/politics/trump-2025-immigration-agenda.html; David Frum, “Trump Promises a ‘Bloody Story’,” The Atlantic, September 8, 2024, available at https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2024/09/donald-trump-bloody-story/679751/.
  34. Danielle Kurtzleben, “Why Trump’s authoritarian language about ‘vermin’ matters,” NPR, November 17, 2023, available at https://www.npr.org/2023/11/17/1213746885/trump-vermin-hitler-immigration-authoritarian-republican-primary; Brett Samuels, “Trump blames Democrats’ rhetoric for latest apparent assassination attempt,” The Hill, September 16, 2024, available at https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4881928-trump-blames-biden-harris-violence/; Marianne LeVine, “Trump calls political enemies ‘vermin,’ echoing dictators Hitler, Mussolini,” The Washington Post, November 13, 2023, available at https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/11/12/trump-rally-vermin-political-opponents/.
  35. Russell Contreras, “Axios Explains: The racist history of Trump’s “poisoning the blood.” Axios, December 30, 2023, available at https://www.axios.com/2023/12/30/trump-poisoning-the-blood-racism; The Wiener Holocaust Museum: “Why did the Holocaust happen?,”(last accessed October 2024); available at https://theholocaustexplained.org/how-and-why/why/eugenics-and-antisemitism/.
  36. Jennifer Dresden, Aaron Baird and Ben Raderstorf, “The Authoritarian Playbook: Scapegoating vulnerable communities,” Protect Democracy, June 15, 2022, available at https://protectdemocracy.org/work/the-authoritarian-playbook/#marginalizing-communities.
  37. Allison McManus, Robert Benson, and Sadhana Mandala, “The Dangers of Project 2025: Global Lessons in Authoritarianism,” Center for American Progress, October 9, 2024, available at https://www.americanprogress.org/article/the-dangers-of-project-2025-global-lessons-in-authoritarianism/; Steve Rose, “A deadly ideology: how the ‘great replacement theory’ went mainstream,” The Guardian, June 8, 2022, available at https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jun/08/a-deadly-ideology-how-the-great-replacement-theory-went-mainstream.
  38. Will Ragland and Joe Radosevich, “Project 2025: The Plan To Seize Power by Gutting America’s System of Checks and Balances.”
  39. Michael Sozan and Ben Olinsky, “Project 2025 Would Destroy the U.S. System of Checks and Balances and Create an Imperial Presidency,” Center for American Progress, October 1, 2024, available at: https://www.americanprogress.org/article/project-2025-would-destroy-the-u-s-system-of-checks-and-balances-and-create-an-imperial-presidency/.
  40. Charlie Savage, “Legal Conservatives’ Long Game: Amp Up Presidential Power but Kneecap Federal Agencies,” The New York Times, July 4, 2024, available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/04/us/politics/conservative-legal-movement-supreme-court.html
  41. Ibid.
  42. Ibid.
  43. Ibid.
  44. Jonathan Swan, Charlie Savage, and Maggie Haberman, “Trump and Allies Forge Plans to Increase Presidential Power in 2025,” The New York Times, July 17, 2023, available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/17/us/politics/trump-plans-2025.html
  45. The Federal Reserve Explained, “Who We Are,” available at: https://www.federalreserve.gov/aboutthefed/fedexplained/who-we-are.htm (last accessed October 2024)
  46. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System FAQ, “What does it mean that the Federal Reserve is “independent within the government”?,” available at: https://www.federalreserve.gov/faqs/about_12799.htm (last accessed October 2024)
  47. Jonathan Swan, Charlie Savage and Maggie Haberman, “Trump and Allies Forge Plans to Increase Presidential Power in 2025,” The New York Times, July 17, 2023, available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/17/us/politics/trump-plans-2025.html
  48. Jeanna Smialek, “Trump Suggests That President Should Have a ‘Say’ in Interest Rates,” The New York Times, August 8, 2024, available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/08/business/economy/trump-fed-interest-rates.html
  49. Michael Sozan and Ben Olinsky, “Project 2025 Would Destroy the U.S. System of Checks and Balances and Create an Imperial Presidency”
  50. Jim Puzzanghera, “Trump is pressuring the Fed to keep interest rates low. Nixon actually did it — and damaged the economy,” The Los Angeles Times, July 27, 2018, available at: https://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-fed-political-pressure-20180727-story.html; Scott Horsley, “Memories of the 1970s haunt the Fed, pushing its aggressive rate moves,” NPR, September 29, 2022, available at: https://www.npr.org/2022/09/29/1125462240/inflation-1970s-volcker-nixon-carter-interest-rates-fed#:~:text=Ultimately%2C%20it%20took%20a%20crackdown,about%20getting%20inflation%20under%20control
  51. Justia, “Independent Agencies Established by Law,” available at https://www.justia.com/administrative-law/independent-agencies/ (last accessed october 2024); Michael Sozan and Ben Olinsky, “Project 2025 Would Destroy the U.S. System of Checks and Balances and Create an Imperial Presidency”
  52. Agenda47, “Using Impoundment to Cut Waste, Stop Inflation, and Crush the Deep State,” June 20, 2023, available at: https://www.donaldjtrump.com/agenda47/agenda47-using-impoundment-to-cut-waste-stop-inflation-and-crush-the-deep-state; The National Constitution Center, “Appropriations Clause,” https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/articles/article-i/clauses/756 (last accessed October 2024)
  53. Bobby Kogan, “How Trump and a Project 2025 Lead Author Are Trying To Undermine Checks and Balances Central to U.S. Governance.” Center for American Progress Action Fund, September 9, 2024, available at: https://www.americanprogressaction.org/article/how-trump-and-a-project-2025-lead-author-are-trying-to-undermine-checks-and-balances-central-to-u-s-governance/
  54. Timothy Cama, “Trump eyes cutting Interior, ‘environment agencies’,” E&E News by Politico, June 3, 2024, https://www.eenews.net/articles/trump-eyes-cutting-interior-environment-agencies/; Donald Trump interview on FOX New’s The Will Cain show, June 3, 2024, available at: https://www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/donald-trump-interview-on-the-will-cain-show
  55. The Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974, Public Law 344, 93rd Cong., 2nd sess. (July 12, 1974), available at https://www.congress.gov/93/statute/STATUTE-88/STATUTE-88-Pg297.pdf; Jeremy Herb, “Government watchdog concludes Trump administration broke law by withholding Ukraine aid,” CNN, January 16, 2020, available at: https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/16/politics/gao-report-administration-violated-law-withholding-aid/index.html
  56. Impeaching Donald John Trump, President of the United States, for high crimes and misdemeanors, 116th Cong., 1st. sess. (February 5, 2020), available at https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/755/text.
  57. Agenda47, “Using Impoundment to Cut Waste, Stop Inflation, and Crush the Deep State”
  58. Trump v. United States, U.S. Supreme Court (July 1, 2024), available at https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf.
  59. Ibid.
  60. Weadé James and Will Ragland, “Project 2025’s Elimination of Title I Funding Would Hurt Students and Decimate Teaching Positions in Local Schools,” Center for American Progress, July 25, 2024, available at: https://www.americanprogress.org/article/project-2025s-elimination-of-title-i-funding-would-hurt-students-and-decimate-teaching-positions-in-local-schools/; Sara Partridge and Madison Weiss, “Project 2025 Would Increase Costs, Block Debt Cancellation for Student Loan Borrowers,” Center for American Progress, June 24, 2024, available at: https://www.americanprogress.org/article/project-2025-would-increase-costs-block-debt-cancellation-for-student-loan-borrowers/; Casey Peeks, “ Project 2025 Would Eliminate Head Start, Severely Restricting Access to Child Care in Rural America,” Center for American Progress,” June 26, 2024, available at: https://www.americanprogress.org/article/project-2025-would-eliminate-head-start-severely-restricting-access-to-child-care-in-rural-america/
  61. Cait Smith, “Project 2025 Policies Would Make Schools Less Safe for All Students,” Center for American Progress, September 9, 2024, available at: https://www.americanprogress.org/article/project-2025-policies-would-make-schools-less-safe-for-all-students/
  62. Laura Barrón-López and Jackson Hudgins, “Trump vows to defund schools requiring vaccines for students if he’s reelected,” PBS, June 24, 2024, available at: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/trump-vows-to-defund-schools-requiring-vaccines-for-students-if-hes-reelected
  63. Jill Rosenthal, “Reversing the Decline in Routine Childhood Immunization Rates Is Good Health, Equity, and Economic Policy,” Center for American Progress, available at: https://www.americanprogress.org/article/reversing-the-decline-in-routine-childhood-immunization-rates-is-good-health-equity-and-economic-policy/; Ann Kellett, “New Research Finds Most Americans Strongly Support Vaccination Requirements For K-12 Students,” Texas A&M University School of Public Health, November 13, 2023, available at: https://today.tamu.edu/2023/11/13/new-research-finds-most-americans-strongly-support-vaccination-requirements-for-k-12-students/
  64. U.S. Department of Education’s National Center for Education Statistics, “Public School Revenue Sources” (last updated May 2024,) available at: https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/cma/public-school-revenue; Adria D. Mathis, Kelley Raines, Nina B. Masters et al, “Measles — United States, January 1, 2020–March 28, 2024,” CDC, April 11, 2024, available at: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/73/wr/mm7314a1.htm; CDC Media Relations, “United States confirmed as country with circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus,” September 13, 2022, available at: https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2022/s0913-polio.html
  65. Ann Kellett, “New Research Finds Most Americans Strongly Support Vaccination Requirements For K-12 Students,”
  66. Elizabeth Williams and Robin Rudowitz, “Headed Back to School in 2024: An Update on Children’s Routine Vaccination Trends,” KFF, July 18, 2024, available at: https://www.kff.org/coronavirus-covid-19/issue-brief/headed-back-to-school-in-2024-an-update-on-childrens-routine-vaccination-trends/
  67. Jill Rosenthal and Marquisha Johns, “Project 2025 Would Eliminate No-Cost Vaccines for 54 Million Medicare Beneficiaries,” Center for American Progress, September 11, 2024, available at: https://www.americanprogress.org/article/project-2025-would-eliminate-no-cost-vaccines-for-54-million-medicare-beneficiaries/; Brian Greenwood, “The contribution of vaccination to global health: past, present and future.,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, June 19, 2014, available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4024226/
  68. CDC, “About Vaccines for your Children,” https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines-children/about/index.html#:~:text=Vaccines%20can%20prevent%20infectious%20diseases,like%20measles%20and%20whooping%20cough. (last accessed October 2024)
  69. CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, “Health and Economic Benefits of Routine Childhood Immunizations in the Era of the Vaccines for Children Program — United States, 1994–2023.”, August 8, 2024, available at: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/73/wr/mm7331a2.htm#suggestedcitation
  70. Anjali Huynh, “5 Noteworthy Falsehoods Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Has Promoted,” The New York Times, July 6, 2023, available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/06/us/politics/rfk-conspiracy-theories-fact-check.html
  71. Aaron Pellish, “RFK Jr. said Trump promised him ‘control’ of HHS and USDA,” CNN, October 29, 2024, available at: https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/29/politics/rfk-trump-control-hhs-usda/index.html.  
  72. Anjali Huynh, “5 Noteworthy Falsehoods Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Has Promoted”
  73. Brendan Duke, “Project 2025’s Tax Plan Would Raise Taxes on the Middle Class and Cut Taxes for the Wealthy,” Center for American Progress, August 27, 2024, available at: https://www.americanprogress.org/article/project-2025s-tax-plan-would-raise-taxes-on-the-middle-class-and-cut-taxes-for-the-wealthy/
  74. Ibid.
  75. Stephanie Lai and Mark Niquette, “Trump Vows 15% Corporate Tax and Taps Musk for Federal Audit,” Bloomberg News, September 5, 2024, available at https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-09-05/trump-vows-15-corporate-tax-and-taps-musk-for-federal-audit?embedded-checkout=true; Brendan Duke and Will Ragland, “Trump’s $50 Billion Tax Giveaway to the 100 Largest Corporations,” Center for American Progress Action Fund, June 12, 2024, available at: https://www.americanprogressaction.org/article/trumps-50-billion-tax-giveaway-to-the-100-largest-corporations/
  76. Aimee Picchi, “16 Nobel Prize-winning economists warn that Trump’s economic plans could reignite inflation” CBS News, June 25, 2024, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-economy-nobel-prize-winners-letter-inflation-warning/
  77. Andrew Duehren, “How Trump Could Upend Taxation in America,” The New York Times, September 22, 2024, https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/22/us/politics/trump-tax-plan.html
  78. Laura Mannweiler, “The Trump and Harris Tax Plans, Explained,” U.S. News & World Report, September 13, 2024, available at: https://www.usnews.com/news/national-news/articles/2024-09-13/trump-vs-harris-on-tax-policy-what-to-know
  79. Brendan Duke, “Former President Trump Proposes an Up to $3,900 Tax Increase for a Typical Family,” Center for American Progress Action Fund, August 15, 2024, available at: https://www.americanprogressaction.org/article/former-president-trump-proposes-an-up-to-3900-tax-increase-for-a-typical-family/
  80. Colin Seeberger, “Project 2025’s Plan To Gut Checks and Balances Harms American Workers,” Center for American Progress, August 12, 2024 , available at: https://www.americanprogress.org/article/project-2025s-plan-to-gut-checks-and-balances-harms-american-workers/; Aurelia Glass, “Project 2025 Would Undo the NLRB’s Progress on Protecting Workers’ Right To Organize,” June 20, 2024, available at: https://www.americanprogress.org/article/project-2025-would-undo-the-nlrbs-progress-on-protecting-workers-right-to-organize/
  81. David Shepardson and Tim Reid, “Trump meets with Teamsters in fight with Biden over union support,” February 1, 2024, available at: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-meet-with-teamsters-fight-with-biden-over-union-support-2024-01-31/; Margaret Poydock, “President Trump has attacked workers’ safety, wages, and rights since Day One,” September 17, 2020, available at: https://www.epi.org/blog/president-trump-has-attacked-workers-safety-wages-and-rights-since-day-one/
  82. Tom Krisher, “Trump praised Elon Musk for firing striking workers, sparking a clash with the UAW,” The Associated Press, August 13, 2024, available at: https://fortune.com/2024/08/13/trump-praised-elon-musk-firing-works-labor-uaw-kamala-harris/
  83. Lawrence Ukenye, “UAW files unfair labor practice charge against Trump, Musk,” Politico, August 13, 2024, available at:https://www.politico.com/news/2024/08/13/trump-musk-uaw-unfair-labor-00173779
  84. Jean Ross, “The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act Failed To Deliver Promised Benefits,” Center for American Progress, April 30, 2024, available at: https://www.americanprogress.org/article/the-tax-cuts-and-jobs-act-failed-to-deliver-promised-benefits/; Mark Joseph Stern, “Donald Trump, Union Buster,” Slate, December 19, 2017, available at: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2017/12/donald-trumps-union-busting-appointees-just-incinerated-obamas-labor-legacy.html; Billy Corriher, “Trump’s Anti-Worker Judges Will Outlast His Administration,” Center for American Progress, October 3, 2017, available at: https://www.americanprogress.org/article/trumps-anti-worker-judges-will-outlast-administration/
  85. Amanda Becker, “Exclusive: U.S. labor powerhouse to launch anti-Trump ad campaign,” Reuters, March 11, 2016, available at: https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-election-unions-idINKCN0WD20R/; Sean Higgins, “Trump: ‘I like right-to-work better’,” The Washington Examiner, February 23, 2016, available at: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/1348878/trump-i-like-right-to-work-better/; The White House, “Press Briefing by Press Secretary Sean Spicer, February 3, 2017 https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefings-statements/press-briefing-press-secretary-sean-spicer-020317/.

The positions of American Progress, and our policy experts, are independent, and the findings and conclusions presented are those of American Progress alone. A full list of supporters is available here. American Progress would like to acknowledge the many generous supporters who make our work possible.

Authors

Kelly McCoy

Senior Director of Broadcast Communications

Will Ragland

Vice President, Research

Department

Communications

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.